Monday, March 18, 2019

Top 5 Penny Stocks To Buy Right Now

tags:PTI,TSN,EGLE,NYMT,UFPT,

Polaris Industries (NYSE:PII) is looking better after a fourth-quarter earnings beat, despite motorcycle sales plunging by double-digit rates. Improvement in sales of off-road vehicles, and its acquisition of Boat Holdings last year, helped the powersports vehicle manufacturer beat Wall Street earnings estimates by a penny per share.

The outlook for the coming year shows investors should expect more of the same. However, profits may be pressured by a combination of higher costs from tariffs, unfavorable currency exchange rates, and higher interest rates.

Image source: Polaris Industries.

Off-road market ready for a rebound

Polaris was able to capture market share again in the off-road vehicle (ORV) segment, which seems to have stabilized. As chairman and CEO Scott Wine remarked on the earnings conference call with analysts, because the industry hasn't experienced any growth for some time, "stabilization is a positive sign."

Top 5 Penny Stocks To Buy Right Now: Patni Computer Systems Limited(PTI)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Chris Lange]

    Proteostasis Therapeutics Inc. (NASDAQ: PTI) saw its shares slide early on Thursday after the company reported that it had positive data from its early stage trial in cystic fibrosis (CF). These results come from the firm's ongoing Phase 1 dosing study of PTI-801 in CF patients on background Orkambi (lumacaftor/ivacaftor) therapy.

Top 5 Penny Stocks To Buy Right Now: Tyson Foods Inc.(TSN)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Demitrios Kalogeropoulos]

    Tyson Foods (NYSE:TSN) underperformed the market last month by shedding 16% compared to a 3.6% increase in the S&P 500, according to data provided by S&P Global Market Intelligence.

  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    TRADEMARK VIOLATION NOTICE: “Regentatlantic Capital LLC Has $5.11 Million Position in Tyson Foods, Inc. (TSN)” was published by Ticker Report and is the property of of Ticker Report. If you are viewing this article on another site, it was illegally copied and reposted in violation of international trademark and copyright law. The legal version of this article can be accessed at https://www.tickerreport.com/banking-finance/4118856/regentatlantic-capital-llc-has-5-11-million-position-in-tyson-foods-inc-tsn.html.

  • [By Shane Hupp]

    Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) – Jefferies Financial Group reduced their Q2 2019 earnings per share estimates for Tyson Foods in a research note issued on Wednesday, February 13th. Jefferies Financial Group analyst A. Jagdale now expects that the company will post earnings of $1.25 per share for the quarter, down from their prior estimate of $1.30. Jefferies Financial Group also issued estimates for Tyson Foods’ FY2020 earnings at $6.70 EPS and FY2021 earnings at $7.28 EPS.

  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    GSA Capital Partners LLP lifted its holdings in Tyson Foods, Inc. (NYSE:TSN) by 140.6% in the second quarter, according to the company in its most recent disclosure with the SEC. The institutional investor owned 33,868 shares of the company’s stock after purchasing an additional 19,791 shares during the quarter. GSA Capital Partners LLP’s holdings in Tyson Foods were worth $2,332,000 at the end of the most recent quarter.

Top 5 Penny Stocks To Buy Right Now: Eagle Bulk Shipping Inc.(EGLE)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    Several brokerages have updated their recommendations and price targets on shares of Eagle Bulk Shipping (NASDAQ: EGLE) in the last few weeks:

    7/2/2018 – Eagle Bulk Shipping was downgraded by analysts at ValuEngine from a “hold” rating to a “sell” rating. 6/28/2018 – Eagle Bulk Shipping was downgraded by analysts at BidaskClub from a “buy” rating to a “hold” rating. 6/18/2018 – Eagle Bulk Shipping is now covered by analysts at Morgan Stanley. They set an “equal weight” rating and a $6.50 price target on the stock. 6/18/2018 – Eagle Bulk Shipping is now covered by analysts at DNB Markets. They set a “buy” rating on the stock. 6/12/2018 – Eagle Bulk Shipping was downgraded by analysts at BidaskClub from a “buy” rating to a “hold” rating. 6/2/2018 – Eagle Bulk Shipping was upgraded by analysts at BidaskClub from a “hold” rating to a “buy” rating. 6/2/2018 – Eagle Bulk Shipping was upgraded by analysts at ValuEngine from a “hold” rating to a “buy” rating. 5/29/2018 – Eagle Bulk Shipping is now covered by analysts at Evercore ISI. They set an “outperform” rating and a $7.50 price target on the stock. 5/15/2018 – Eagle Bulk Shipping was upgraded by analysts at Zacks Investment Research from a “sell” rating to a “hold” rating. According to Zacks, “Eagle Bulk Shipping is the largest U.S. based owner of Handymax dry bulk vessels. Handymax dry bulk vessels range in size from 35,000 to 60,000 deadweight tons, or dwt, and transport a broad range of major and minor bulk cargoes, including iron ore, coal, grain, cement and fertilizer, along worldwide shipping routes. “ 5/9/2018 – Eagle Bulk Shipping had its “hold” rating reaffirmed by analysts at Maxim Group. They now have a $6.00 price target on the
  • [By Joseph Griffin]

    Eagle Bulk Shipping Inc. (NASDAQ:EGLE) major shareholder Goldentree Asset Management Lp acquired 84,969 shares of the business’s stock in a transaction on Monday, February 11th. The shares were bought at an average cost of $4.02 per share, for a total transaction of $341,575.38. The acquisition was disclosed in a legal filing with the SEC, which is available at this link. Large shareholders that own at least 10% of a company’s shares are required to disclose their transactions with the SEC.

  • [By Motley Fool Transcribers]

    Eagle Bulk Shipping Inc  (NASDAQ:EGLE)Q4 2018 Earnings Conference CallMarch 06, 2019, 8:00 a.m. ET

    Contents: Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants Prepared Remarks:

    Operator

Top 5 Penny Stocks To Buy Right Now: New York Mortgage Trust Inc.(NYMT)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Ethan Ryder]

    Bank of New York Mellon Corp cut its position in shares of NY Mtg Tr Inc/SH (NASDAQ:NYMT) by 2.1% during the 2nd quarter, according to the company in its most recent filing with the SEC. The firm owned 1,265,207 shares of the real estate investment trust’s stock after selling 27,565 shares during the quarter. Bank of New York Mellon Corp owned 1.13% of NY Mtg Tr Inc/SH worth $7,604,000 as of its most recent filing with the SEC.

  • [By Shane Hupp]

    NY MTG TR INC/SH (NASDAQ:NYMT) has been given a consensus recommendation of “Hold” by the seven research firms that are covering the company, MarketBeat reports. Five investment analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating, one has assigned a buy rating and one has assigned a strong buy rating to the company. The average twelve-month price target among brokerages that have issued a report on the stock in the last year is $6.38.

  • [By Max Byerly]

    NY Mtg Tr Inc/SH (NASDAQ:NYMT) last released its quarterly earnings data on Thursday, August 2nd. The real estate investment trust reported $0.20 EPS for the quarter, beating the Thomson Reuters’ consensus estimate of $0.15 by $0.05. NY Mtg Tr Inc/SH had a net margin of 24.78% and a return on equity of 17.07%. The business had revenue of $17.50 million during the quarter. analysts anticipate that NY Mtg Tr Inc/SH will post 0.24 EPS for the current year.

Top 5 Penny Stocks To Buy Right Now: UFP Technologies Inc.(UFPT)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Ethan Ryder]

    Media coverage about UFP Technologies (NASDAQ:UFPT) has trended somewhat positive recently, Accern Sentiment Analysis reports. The research group identifies positive and negative press coverage by reviewing more than twenty million blog and news sources. Accern ranks coverage of publicly-traded companies on a scale of negative one to positive one, with scores closest to one being the most favorable. UFP Technologies earned a daily sentiment score of 0.03 on Accern’s scale. Accern also assigned headlines about the industrial products company an impact score of 47.0533500754779 out of 100, meaning that recent press coverage is somewhat unlikely to have an impact on the company’s share price in the near future.

  • [By Joseph Griffin]

    UFP Technologies (NASDAQ: UFPT) and China XD Plastics (NASDAQ:CXDC) are both small-cap industrial products companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two companies based on the strength of their dividends, valuation, analyst recommendations, institutional ownership, risk, profitability and earnings.

  • [By Logan Wallace]

    China XD Plastics (NASDAQ: CXDC) and UFP Technologies (NASDAQ:UFPT) are both small-cap basic materials companies, but which is the better stock? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their profitability, analyst recommendations, dividends, institutional ownership, earnings, risk and valuation.

Friday, March 15, 2019

This Is How Much Millennials Have Saved for Retirement. This Is How Much They'll Need.

Before the Great Recession, millennials -- those born between approximately 1981 and 1996 -- hadn't saved much for retirement. But they've bounced back impressively since. The median millennial retirement fund hit $36,000 in 2017, according to the Transamerica Center for Retirement Studies, a whopping four times the $9,000 average from 2007.

That growth far exceeds the increases older generations enjoyed during the same period. Both Generation X and Baby Boomers more than doubled their retirement nest eggs over those 10 years, from $32,000 to $71,000 and from $75,000 to $157,000, respectively -- a robust climb, but nowhere close to millennials' success.

Group of friends posing to have cell phone picture taken.

IMAGE SOURCE: GETTY IMAGES.

How much is needed?

Kudos to millennials for the impressive increase. But this generation may still be lagging behind what they'll need for retirement. In fact, most members of every generational cohort are falling behind their own targeted goals, according to the Stanford Center on Longevity.

Millennials won't be able to rest on their laurels, that's for sure. Respondents to the Transamerica Center's survey on retirement estimated they would need $500,000 saved for life after work. Let's say a 35-year-old millennial has saved the $36,000 median amount, plans to retire at 67, and will receive the stock market's average historical return of 7% annually over the next 32 years. By then, that $36,000 figure will have grown to just $293,224.

But if we assume this person has a $50,000 salary and keeps up a steady retirement savings, putting away 5% of it annually over the same period? Then they would be comfortably over the half-million mark, at $548,507.

How much is enough?

The jury is out on whether half a million dollars will actually result in a comfortable retirement. It's estimated that retirees will need approximately 80% of their salary prior to retirement to live comfortably. The $548,507 figure would yield a comfortable 80% of a $50,000 salary until our hypothetical retiree is 82. After that, there would be no more money.

These figures do not include Social Security, however. That's currently estimated to provide about 40% of a retiree's income before retirement, leaving savings to fulfill the other 60%. For our hypothetical saver, the $548,507 could contribute 40% of a $50,000 income until the age of 100.

Millennials are anxious about the continuing existence of Social Security, however; 80% think it may not be around at all when they retire, according to the Transamerica Center. Despite these fears, though, Social Security is likely to be there in some form when millennials retire.

That said, our example above does pinpoint how necessary it is to have a firm sense of your own retirement plans. Again, all generational groups are falling short of their targeted retirement savings, with younger people lagging behind their elders. We can also see that estimates for how much people need to save for retirement vary, from 10% of income if the saver starts at age 25 to 27% if they start at 45. Currently, millennials are estimated to be saving a median of 7% to 10% of their income for retirement.

Is that enough? It's virtually impossible to give a yes-or-no answer that applies to everyone. Retirement plans vary enormously. How long you expect to live, where you expect to live, your spending patterns, your housing, your lifestyle, and your plans in retirement (travel? Be a couch potato?) all make a significant difference in how much you'll need.

How to determine the retirement savings you require

The solution is to have a thoughtful, concrete plan for how much you as an individual will need. Only 10% of folks in a Transamerica Center study, for example, had used a retirement calculator. Yet retirement calculators can run multiple scenarios and let you know how much to save for each.

Beyond calculators, there are two basic methods of estimating your retirement savings needs. One is to save an amount equal to 10 times your estimated income at retirement. A person expecting to earn $60,000 at retirement, then, would need to save $600,000. If you're 25 and making $25,000, how do you estimate what your income will be at the time you retire? A good rule of thumb is to assume a 2% salary increase annually over time.

The second is to use the 4% rule to calculate how much you need to save to replace 40% of your estimated income before retirement. (Remember, you need 80% of that in retirement, and Social Security is designed to replace roughly 40%.) Retirees can then withdraw 4% of their savings per year over 30 years.

To arrive at how much you need to save using the 4% rule, multiply the estimated amount you'll need yearly at retirement by 25. So if you expect your pre-retirement salary to be $60,000, you'd need 40% of that -- $24,000 -- from savings every year. Multiply that by 25 to find the number you need to save: $600,000.

Keep in mind that it's prudent to run several different scenarios for any retirement plan. If you're not comfortable assuming a Social Security contribution, for example, you can leave it out. If you want to make your retirement last more than 30 years, adjust accordingly. Both these rules are guidelines that can bring you to a safe and comfortable retirement.

Wednesday, March 13, 2019

Here are the ETFs with the most exposure to Boeing

The sharp decline in shares of Boeing was felt across the stock market Monday, dragging the Dow Jones Industrial Average down more than 200 points at the lows of the session. The stock shed more than 13 percent after the aircraft manufacturer saw its second 737 MAX 8 plane crash in less than five months on Sunday.

Boeing is not only one of the biggest point drivers for the Dow, but its impact can also be felt in 215 U.S.-listed exchange-traded funds. The three ETFs with the most exposure to Boeing are the iShares U.S. Aerospace & Defense ETF, with 13 percent exposure; the SPDR Dow Jones Industrial Average ETF, with 11 percent exposure; and the Industrial Select Sector SPDR Fund, with 10 percent exposure.

Experts said there are a few paths that investors with exposure to Boeing should consider.

"Weigh in the news. Do your homework," Chris Hempstead, head of ETF trading at Deutsche Bank, tells CNBC's "ETF Edge." "If you're a retail investor, read as much as you can. Get a sense of where you want to be with this kind of news. Decide how far the market is taking these stocks down as a result of the news, and if that's something you disagree with, you want to go in."

Investors who are bullish on the company's prospects should start positions in the ETFs with the most exposure to Boeing, Hempstead said Monday, but they should also remember just how much scale that stock has.

"Keep in mind: a name like Boeing is in more than just those aerospace and defense ETFs. There is massive exposure to Boeing in the S&P 500 ETFs from iShares, Vanguard and State Street," Hempstead said. "So it's going to move the markets one way or another, but depending on where you value Boeing, it should direct you to which ETFs you choose."

John Davi, founder, CEO and CIO of Astoria Portfolio Advisors, called Boeing's widespread influence on the industrial sector and the stock market as a whole "a double-edged sword."

"Obviously, when you have good news, it benefits you, and bad news, it'll hurt you. So, if you're uncomfortable with that risk-reward, then maybe you need to look at something that's a little bit more equal-weighted," he told "ETF Edge."

Boeing shares have gained some 300 percent in the last five years, double the advance of the S&P 500.

Disclaimer

Tuesday, March 12, 2019

These elite private colleges could be surprisingly affordable

When it comes figuring out how they'll pay for college, many families start by shying away from pricey private schools.

Yes, annual tuition plus room and board at four-year, private universities is much higher — $48,510, on average in the current academic year — compared with just $21,370 at public institutions, according to the College Board.

However, about two-thirds of all full-time students receive aid, which can bring the net price way down.

Your net price is a college's tuition and fees minus grants, scholarships and education tax benefits, according to the College Board.

In fact, the top schools for financial aid all have sky-high sticker prices, yet their very generous aid packages make them surprisingly affordable, according to The Princeton Review.

"Don't make the tragic mistake of crossing an expensive school off your list of consideration," said Robert Franek, The Princeton Review's editor-in-chief and author of "The Best Value Colleges."

When it comes to offering aid, private schools typically have more money to spend, he added. In fact, "these schools become even more affordable than your home state university."

The Princeton Review ranked colleges by how much financial aid is awarded and how satisfied students are with their packages. The report is based on data collected from fall 2017 through summer 2018.

Here are the top 10:

10. Colgate University Colgate University, with Taylor Lake in the foreground, is shown in Hamilton, N.Y. Source: Wikimedia Commons Colgate University, with Taylor Lake in the foreground, is shown in Hamilton, N.Y.

Location: Hamilton, New York
Tuition, fees, room and board: $67,500
Average need-based scholarship: $48,369
Out-of-pocket cost: $19,131

Students here have a healthy dose of school spirit, with good reason: Colgate is one of the top liberal arts schools in the country, even though it has a price tag to match. Still, students receive over $48,000 in grant aid, on average, making it a much more affordable place to matriculate.

9. California Institute of Technology California Institute of Technology Danita Delimont | Getty Images California Institute of Technology

Location: Pasadena, California
Tuition, fees, room and board: $64,704
Average need-based scholarship: $45,797
Out-of-pocket cost: $18,907

This small school in the mountains near Los Angeles is a worldwide academic powerhouse. The science and engineering college boasts a lengthy history of significant research achievements and it also delivers on aid, meeting 100 percent of demonstrated student need.

8. Washington University in St. Louis Brookings Hall at Washington University in St. Louis. Stephen Ehlers | Getty Images Brookings Hall at Washington University in St. Louis.

Location: St. Louis, Missouri
Tuition, fees, room and board: $69,839
Average need-based scholarship: $43,745
Out-of-pocket cost: $26,094

At first glance, Wash U. is another one of the pricier schools on The Princeton Review list. However, it is similarly committed to helping defray the cost without relying on loan debt. For starters, it has eliminated need-based loans to students from low- and middle-income families, which means that those dollars never have to be paid back.

7. Williams College The Symmes Gate on the campus of Williams College. John Greim | LightRocket | Getty Images The Symmes Gate on the campus of Williams College.

Location: Williamstown, Massachusetts
Tuition, fees, room and board: $69,950
Average need-based scholarship: $51,773
Out-of-pocket cost: $18,177

One of the nation's very best schools – on par with any Ivy league institution — Williams College also gets a top score for its ability to finance its students' educations. The school meets 100 percent of demonstrated need for all undergrads for all four years. "You'd be insane to choose a lesser school instead because of the sticker price," Franek said.

6. Vanderbilt University General view of the Benson Science Hall on the campus of the Vanderbilt Commodores in Nashville, Tennessee. Vanderbilt | Collegiate Images | Getty Images General view of the Benson Science Hall on the campus of the Vanderbilt Commodores in Nashville, Tennessee.

Location: Nashville, Tennessee
Tuition, fees, room and board: $66,050
Average need-based scholarship: $47,294
Out-of-pocket cost: $18,756

Every year, Vanderbilt distributes more than $42 million in aid. In addition to gift assistance, the school is known for its three signature scholarships, which all cover full tuition and offer summer stipends to study abroad, complete service projects or conduct research. And they are renewable for all four years of college.

5. Pomona College Pomona College Source: Wikipedia Pomona College

Location: Claremont, California
Tuition, fees, room and board: $67,225
Average need-based scholarship: $50,069
Out-of-pocket cost: $17,156

As a member of the Claremont Colleges, a group of highly regarded schools just outside of Los Angeles, admission to Pomona is tough but also need-blind. The goal is to achieve "significant socio-economic diversity," according to Adam Sapp, Pomona's senior associate dean and director of admissions.

4. Yale University Yale University campus, New Haven, CT Craig Warga | Bloomberg | Getty Images Yale University campus, New Haven, CT

Location: New Haven, Connecticut
Tuition, fees, room and board: $64,650
Average need-based scholarship: $47,960
Out-of-pocket cost: $16,690

This Ivy puts its money where its mouth is: Committed to meeting 100 percent of each applicant's demonstrated need, Yale spends more than $140 million on financial aid each year. As a result, more than 10 percent of the student body will have $0 expected parent contribution in 2019.

3. Princeton University Lockhart Hall at Princeton University John Greim/LOOP IMAGES | Getty Images Lockhart Hall at Princeton University

Location: Princeton, New Jersey
Tuition, fees, room and board: $62,750
Average need-based scholarship: $51,365
Out-of-pocket cost: $11,385

This is another elite Ivy League school that makes the top of many college lists. It's also highly regarded for its war on student debt. Princeton has eliminated all loans for students who qualify for aid. Instead, awards come in the form of grants that do not need to be repaid.

2. Vassar College Vassar College prichman38 | Flickr Vassar College

Location: Poughkeepsie, New York
Tuition, fees, room and board: $70,510
Average need-based scholarship: $48,194
Out-of-pocket cost: $22,316

Vassar is one of most expensive colleges in the country and also one of the most generous. The average scholarship is just over $48,000, making this top liberal arts school with a stunning campus harder to get into than afford.

1. Bowdoin College Joshua Chamberlain statue at the entrance to the Bowdoin campus in Brunswick, Maine. Gregory Rec | Portland Press Herald | Getty Images Joshua Chamberlain statue at the entrance to the Bowdoin campus in Brunswick, Maine.

Location: Brunswick, Maine
Tuition, fees, room and board: $68,620
Average need-based scholarship: $44,824
Out-of-pocket cost: $23,796

This small college on the coast of Maine is a triple threat: highly competitive, picturesque and price-sensitive. The school's well-endowed grant budget, coupled with work study and other scholarship and grant opportunities, means that more than half, or 52 percent, of enrolled students receive need-based aid.

More from Invest In You:
Kids with debit cards? Maybe it's not such a bad idea after all
Are you smarter than a 5th grader (when it comes to money)?
Figuring out your net worth isn't just for the 1 percenters

Disclosure: NBCUniversal and Comcast Ventures are investors in Acorns.

Monday, March 11, 2019

Claraphi Advisory Network LLC Decreases Position in Pool Co. (POOL)

Claraphi Advisory Network LLC trimmed its holdings in Pool Co. (NASDAQ:POOL) by 13.0% in the 4th quarter, according to the company in its most recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The institutional investor owned 1,539 shares of the specialty retailer’s stock after selling 229 shares during the quarter. Claraphi Advisory Network LLC’s holdings in Pool were worth $229,000 as of its most recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC).

Several other institutional investors have also modified their holdings of the stock. Twin Tree Management LP bought a new stake in Pool during the 3rd quarter valued at about $1,560,000. Great West Life Assurance Co. Can boosted its holdings in shares of Pool by 1.7% during the 3rd quarter. Great West Life Assurance Co. Can now owns 37,564 shares of the specialty retailer’s stock valued at $6,276,000 after acquiring an additional 642 shares during the last quarter. Morgan Stanley boosted its holdings in shares of Pool by 175.9% in the third quarter. Morgan Stanley now owns 173,252 shares of the specialty retailer’s stock worth $28,913,000 after buying an additional 110,457 shares during the last quarter. KDI Capital Partners LLC boosted its holdings in shares of Pool by 2.8% in the third quarter. KDI Capital Partners LLC now owns 40,294 shares of the specialty retailer’s stock worth $6,724,000 after buying an additional 1,110 shares during the last quarter. Finally, Bell Rock Capital LLC purchased a new position in shares of Pool in the third quarter worth approximately $1,796,000. Institutional investors own 93.33% of the company’s stock.

Get Pool alerts:

A number of equities analysts recently issued reports on POOL shares. BidaskClub downgraded shares of Pool from a “strong-buy” rating to a “buy” rating in a report on Tuesday, December 11th. Zacks Investment Research raised shares of Pool from a “hold” rating to a “buy” rating and set a $174.00 price objective on the stock in a report on Wednesday, November 28th. Robert W. Baird raised shares of Pool from a “neutral” rating to an “outperform” rating and raised their price objective for the stock from $160.00 to $177.00 in a report on Friday, February 22nd. Finally, ValuEngine downgraded shares of Pool from a “buy” rating to a “hold” rating in a report on Friday, February 15th. Four investment analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating and two have given a buy rating to the company’s stock. The stock currently has an average rating of “Hold” and an average price target of $160.25.

Shares of NASDAQ:POOL opened at $156.86 on Friday. The company has a current ratio of 2.99, a quick ratio of 0.79 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 2.94. Pool Co. has a 1-year low of $135.76 and a 1-year high of $175.87. The company has a market cap of $6.39 billion, a price-to-earnings ratio of 27.91, a PEG ratio of 1.09 and a beta of 0.92.

Pool (NASDAQ:POOL) last issued its quarterly earnings results on Thursday, February 14th. The specialty retailer reported $0.41 earnings per share for the quarter, missing the consensus estimate of $0.44 by ($0.03). Pool had a net margin of 7.82% and a return on equity of 80.86%. The firm had revenue of $543.00 million for the quarter, compared to analysts’ expectations of $551.58 million. During the same period in the prior year, the firm earned $0.50 EPS. Pool’s revenue for the quarter was up 6.5% compared to the same quarter last year. On average, equities research analysts predict that Pool Co. will post 6.18 EPS for the current fiscal year.

The company also recently declared a quarterly dividend, which will be paid on Thursday, March 28th. Shareholders of record on Thursday, March 14th will be issued a dividend of $0.45 per share. This represents a $1.80 annualized dividend and a yield of 1.15%. The ex-dividend date is Wednesday, March 13th. Pool’s dividend payout ratio is currently 32.03%.

In other news, Vice Chairman De La Mesa Manuel J. Perez sold 2,851 shares of Pool stock in a transaction that occurred on Thursday, February 28th. The shares were sold at an average price of $161.02, for a total transaction of $459,068.02. Following the sale, the insider now owns 66,202 shares in the company, valued at $10,659,846.04. The transaction was disclosed in a document filed with the SEC, which is available at this link. Also, Vice Chairman De La Mesa Manuel J. Perez sold 50,400 shares of Pool stock in a transaction that occurred on Tuesday, February 26th. The shares were sold at an average price of $160.51, for a total transaction of $8,089,704.00. Following the sale, the insider now owns 69,041 shares in the company, valued at approximately $11,081,770.91. The disclosure for this sale can be found here. Company insiders own 6.00% of the company’s stock.

ILLEGAL ACTIVITY WARNING: This article was originally published by Ticker Report and is the property of of Ticker Report. If you are reading this article on another website, it was stolen and republished in violation of international copyright laws. The correct version of this article can be accessed at https://www.tickerreport.com/banking-finance/4205880/claraphi-advisory-network-llc-decreases-position-in-pool-co-pool.html.

Pool Profile

Pool Corporation distributes swimming pool supplies, equipment, and related leisure products in North America, Europe, South America, and Australia. The company offers maintenance products, including chemicals, supplies, and pool accessories; repair and replacement parts for pool equipment, such as cleaners, filters, heaters, pumps, and lights; packaged pool kits comprising walls, liners, braces, and coping for in-ground and above-ground pools; pool equipment and components for new pool construction and the remodeling of existing pools; and irrigation and landscape products consisting of irrigation system components, and professional lawn care equipment and supplies.

Further Reading: Price-Sales Ratio

Want to see what other hedge funds are holding POOL? Visit HoldingsChannel.com to get the latest 13F filings and insider trades for Pool Co. (NASDAQ:POOL).

Institutional Ownership by Quarter for Pool (NASDAQ:POOL)

Saturday, March 9, 2019

Anne Mccallion Sells 10,000 Shares of PennyMac Financial Services Inc (PFSI) Stock

PennyMac Financial Services Inc (NYSE:PFSI) insider Anne Mccallion sold 10,000 shares of the stock in a transaction dated Tuesday, March 5th. The stock was sold at an average price of $22.99, for a total transaction of $229,900.00. The sale was disclosed in a filing with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which is available at the SEC website.

Anne Mccallion also recently made the following trade(s):

Get PennyMac Financial Services alerts: On Thursday, February 28th, Anne Mccallion sold 10,000 shares of PennyMac Financial Services stock. The stock was sold at an average price of $23.28, for a total transaction of $232,800.00. On Friday, February 15th, Anne Mccallion sold 20,837 shares of PennyMac Financial Services stock. The stock was sold at an average price of $22.83, for a total transaction of $475,708.71. On Tuesday, February 12th, Anne Mccallion sold 5,100 shares of PennyMac Financial Services stock. The stock was sold at an average price of $21.97, for a total transaction of $112,047.00. On Tuesday, January 29th, Anne Mccallion sold 5,000 shares of PennyMac Financial Services stock. The shares were sold at an average price of $20.94, for a total transaction of $104,700.00. On Wednesday, January 16th, Anne Mccallion sold 5,000 shares of PennyMac Financial Services stock. The shares were sold at an average price of $20.78, for a total transaction of $103,900.00. On Wednesday, January 2nd, Anne Mccallion sold 5,000 shares of PennyMac Financial Services stock. The shares were sold at an average price of $21.29, for a total transaction of $106,450.00. On Tuesday, December 18th, Anne Mccallion sold 6,100 shares of PennyMac Financial Services stock. The shares were sold at an average price of $21.69, for a total transaction of $132,309.00. On Friday, December 7th, Anne Mccallion sold 10,000 shares of PennyMac Financial Services stock. The shares were sold at an average price of $22.03, for a total transaction of $220,300.00.

PFSI stock traded down $0.84 during trading on Thursday, hitting $22.20. 10,164 shares of the stock traded hands, compared to its average volume of 288,333. The company has a debt-to-equity ratio of 1.27, a quick ratio of 0.18 and a current ratio of 0.18. The company has a market capitalization of $580.61 million, a price-to-earnings ratio of 8.57, a price-to-earnings-growth ratio of 0.87 and a beta of 0.40. PennyMac Financial Services Inc has a 1 year low of $18.77 and a 1 year high of $24.95.

PennyMac Financial Services (NYSE:PFSI) last announced its quarterly earnings results on Thursday, February 7th. The real estate investment trust reported $0.63 earnings per share (EPS) for the quarter, beating analysts’ consensus estimates of $0.55 by $0.08. The firm had revenue of $251.20 million for the quarter, compared to the consensus estimate of $238.79 million. PennyMac Financial Services had a net margin of 8.91% and a return on equity of 4.80%. As a group, research analysts predict that PennyMac Financial Services Inc will post 2.81 earnings per share for the current fiscal year.

Several analysts recently commented on the stock. Zacks Investment Research raised shares of PennyMac Financial Services from a “strong sell” rating to a “hold” rating in a research report on Saturday, November 17th. JMP Securities reissued a “hold” rating on shares of PennyMac Financial Services in a research report on Wednesday. Finally, Barclays set a $25.00 price objective on shares of PennyMac Financial Services and gave the company a “buy” rating in a research report on Friday, December 14th. Four investment analysts have rated the stock with a hold rating and three have given a buy rating to the company. The company currently has an average rating of “Hold” and a consensus target price of $23.00.

Hedge funds and other institutional investors have recently made changes to their positions in the company. Martingale Asset Management L P boosted its holdings in shares of PennyMac Financial Services by 447.2% during the 3rd quarter. Martingale Asset Management L P now owns 57,452 shares of the real estate investment trust’s stock valued at $1,201,000 after acquiring an additional 46,952 shares during the last quarter. Globeflex Capital L P boosted its holdings in shares of PennyMac Financial Services by 14.8% during the 3rd quarter. Globeflex Capital L P now owns 71,961 shares of the real estate investment trust’s stock valued at $1,504,000 after acquiring an additional 9,300 shares during the last quarter. Professional Planning purchased a new stake in shares of PennyMac Financial Services during the 4th quarter valued at about $5,370,000. Vanguard Group Inc boosted its holdings in shares of PennyMac Financial Services by 2.6% during the 3rd quarter. Vanguard Group Inc now owns 1,900,582 shares of the real estate investment trust’s stock valued at $39,722,000 after acquiring an additional 48,802 shares during the last quarter. Finally, Allianz Asset Management GmbH boosted its holdings in shares of PennyMac Financial Services by 19.2% during the 3rd quarter. Allianz Asset Management GmbH now owns 68,017 shares of the real estate investment trust’s stock valued at $1,422,000 after acquiring an additional 10,962 shares during the last quarter. 88.79% of the stock is currently owned by hedge funds and other institutional investors.

TRADEMARK VIOLATION WARNING: “Anne Mccallion Sells 10,000 Shares of PennyMac Financial Services Inc (PFSI) Stock” was originally published by Ticker Report and is the property of of Ticker Report. If you are viewing this news story on another site, it was illegally stolen and republished in violation of United States & international trademark and copyright laws. The original version of this news story can be viewed at https://www.tickerreport.com/banking-finance/4204558/anne-mccallion-sells-10000-shares-of-pennymac-financial-services-inc-pfsi-stock.html.

PennyMac Financial Services Company Profile

PennyMac Financial Services, Inc a specialty financial services company, engages in the mortgage banking and investment management activities in the United States. It is involved in the origination, acquisition, and sale of mortgage loans. The company originates first-lien residential conventional and government-insured or guaranteed mortgage loans to allow customers to purchase or refinance their homes.

Further Reading: Why do companies pay special dividends?

Insider Buying and Selling by Quarter for PennyMac Financial Services (NYSE:PFSI)

Art Institute of Seattle Closing for Good Tomorrow

The Art Institute of Seattle will be closing its doors permanently tomorrow following more than seven decades in operation.

Art Institute of Seattle ClosingArt Institute of Seattle ClosingThe Washington-based organization said it will be shutting down on Friday without a notice, leaving roughly 650 students wondering how and where they’ll get their degree as they will no longer have classes or professors. The move was announced by the Washington Student Achievement Council (WSAC), which is a state regulation agency.

The organization unveiled the news to the public on Wednesday after a 73-year stint, which is only a little over two weeks before the end of the winter quarter. Students such as Sarah Fuad are understandably upset over the move as she moved from Saudi Arabia in 2016 to study fashion design and was only a quarter away from earning her degree.

Fuad was on the path to an early finish, but she may need to leave the U.S. within 60 days if she’s unable to find a new school. “I’d rather die than go back home with nothing,” adding that she feels broken. She added that her father shelled out more than $100,000 on tuition, and even more when you add rent to the mix.

Her parents had planned on coming to the U.S. to watch her get her diploma, but those plans are likely scrapped now. Fuad has already applied to another school to see if she can earn her degree there.

Compare Brokers

Friday, March 8, 2019

Johnson & Johnson (JNJ) Expected to Post Earnings of $2.10 Per Share

Wall Street analysts expect Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ) to announce earnings of $2.10 per share for the current quarter, Zacks reports. Three analysts have issued estimates for Johnson & Johnson’s earnings, with estimates ranging from $1.99 to $2.15. Johnson & Johnson posted earnings per share of $2.06 during the same quarter last year, which would indicate a positive year-over-year growth rate of 1.9%. The business is expected to report its next earnings results on Tuesday, April 16th.

On average, analysts expect that Johnson & Johnson will report full year earnings of $8.57 per share for the current fiscal year, with EPS estimates ranging from $8.50 to $8.60. For the next financial year, analysts forecast that the firm will report earnings of $9.23 per share, with EPS estimates ranging from $9.19 to $9.30. Zacks’ EPS averages are an average based on a survey of research analysts that follow Johnson & Johnson.

Get Johnson & Johnson alerts:

Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ) last issued its earnings results on Tuesday, January 22nd. The company reported $1.97 EPS for the quarter, topping the consensus estimate of $1.95 by $0.02. Johnson & Johnson had a net margin of 18.75% and a return on equity of 35.63%. The company had revenue of $20.39 billion for the quarter, compared to the consensus estimate of $20.27 billion. During the same period in the previous year, the firm earned $1.74 earnings per share. The firm’s revenue for the quarter was up 1.0% on a year-over-year basis.

Several research analysts recently commented on JNJ shares. Zacks Investment Research raised shares of Johnson & Johnson from a “hold” rating to a “buy” rating and set a $165.00 target price on the stock in a research note on Tuesday, November 20th. ValuEngine raised shares of Johnson & Johnson from a “hold” rating to a “buy” rating in a research note on Thursday, December 13th. Morgan Stanley decreased their target price on shares of Johnson & Johnson from $153.00 to $130.00 and set an “equal weight” rating on the stock in a research note on Wednesday, January 2nd. Finally, Barclays reaffirmed an “equal weight” rating and issued a $135.00 target price (down from $137.00) on shares of Johnson & Johnson in a research note on Wednesday, January 23rd. Two equities research analysts have rated the stock with a sell rating, six have assigned a hold rating and eight have issued a buy rating to the company. The company has a consensus rating of “Hold” and a consensus target price of $142.81.

In related news, Director Charles Prince purchased 2,000 shares of the business’s stock in a transaction that occurred on Friday, December 14th. The shares were acquired at an average price of $134.37 per share, for a total transaction of $268,740.00. Following the completion of the acquisition, the director now directly owns 28,520 shares in the company, valued at approximately $3,832,232.40. The acquisition was disclosed in a document filed with the Securities & Exchange Commission, which can be accessed through this link. Also, CAO Ronald A. Kapusta sold 3,643 shares of Johnson & Johnson stock in a transaction on Thursday, December 13th. The shares were sold at an average price of $147.31, for a total transaction of $536,650.33. Following the completion of the sale, the chief accounting officer now owns 13,641 shares in the company, valued at approximately $2,009,455.71. The disclosure for this sale can be found here. Insiders own 0.22% of the company’s stock.

A number of large investors have recently added to or reduced their stakes in the stock. Evolution Wealth Advisors LLC bought a new stake in shares of Johnson & Johnson during the 4th quarter valued at $40,000. Crewe Advisors LLC boosted its stake in Johnson & Johnson by 75.0% in the 4th quarter. Crewe Advisors LLC now owns 350 shares of the company’s stock worth $45,000 after purchasing an additional 150 shares in the last quarter. Horan Securities Inc. boosted its stake in Johnson & Johnson by 122.3% in the 4th quarter. Horan Securities Inc. now owns 438 shares of the company’s stock worth $56,000 after purchasing an additional 241 shares in the last quarter. Stuart Chaussee & Associates Inc. boosted its stake in Johnson & Johnson by 20.7% in the 4th quarter. Stuart Chaussee & Associates Inc. now owns 466 shares of the company’s stock worth $60,000 after purchasing an additional 80 shares in the last quarter. Finally, Ruggie Capital Group raised its position in Johnson & Johnson by 342.5% in the 4th quarter. Ruggie Capital Group now owns 469 shares of the company’s stock worth $60,000 after buying an additional 363 shares during the last quarter. Institutional investors and hedge funds own 66.16% of the company’s stock.

Shares of NYSE JNJ traded down $0.85 during mid-day trading on Thursday, hitting $138.24. The stock had a trading volume of 6,098,258 shares, compared to its average volume of 6,677,139. The company has a quick ratio of 1.40, a current ratio of 1.47 and a debt-to-equity ratio of 0.46. Johnson & Johnson has a 1 year low of $118.62 and a 1 year high of $148.99. The company has a market cap of $366.48 billion, a price-to-earnings ratio of 16.90, a PEG ratio of 2.18 and a beta of 0.68.

The business also recently declared a quarterly dividend, which will be paid on Tuesday, March 12th. Investors of record on Tuesday, February 26th will be issued a $0.90 dividend. This represents a $3.60 annualized dividend and a yield of 2.60%. The ex-dividend date of this dividend is Monday, February 25th. Johnson & Johnson’s dividend payout ratio (DPR) is currently 44.01%.

Johnson & Johnson announced that its board has authorized a stock repurchase plan on Monday, December 17th that authorizes the company to repurchase $5.00 billion in outstanding shares. This repurchase authorization authorizes the company to buy up to 1.5% of its stock through open market purchases. Stock repurchase plans are typically an indication that the company’s leadership believes its stock is undervalued.

About Johnson & Johnson

Johnson & Johnson, together with its subsidiaries, researches and develops, manufactures, and sells various products in the health care field worldwide. Its Consumer segment offers baby care products under the JOHNSON'S brand; oral care products under the LISTERINE brand; beauty products under the AVEENO, CLEAN & CLEAR, DABAO, JOHNSON'S Adult, LE PETITE MARSEILLAIS, NEUTROGENA, RoC, and OGX brands; over-the-counter medicines, including acetaminophen products under the TYLENOL brand; cold, flu, and allergy products under the SUDAFED brand; allergy products under the BENADRYL and ZYRTEC brands; ibuprofen products under the MOTRIN IB brand; and acid reflux products under the PEPCID brand.

Recommended Story: How to read a candlestick chart

Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Johnson & Johnson (JNJ)

For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

Earnings History and Estimates for Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ)

Thursday, March 7, 2019

Moody's Corporation (MCO) President and CEO Raymond W Mcdaniel Sold $7.7 million of Shares

President and CEO of Moody's Corporation (NYSE:MCO) Raymond W Mcdaniel sold 44,146 shares of MCO on 03/04/2019 at an average price of $175.2 a share. The total sale was $7.7 million.

Moody's Corporation publishes credit ratings, and research reports on fixed-income securities, issuers of securities, and other credit obligations. The company primarily provides opinions and reports to investors and institutions. Moody's Corporation has a market cap of $32.67 billion; its shares were traded at around $171.06 with a P/E ratio of 25.39 and P/S ratio of 7.49. The dividend yield of Moody's Corporation stocks is 1.06%. Moody's Corporation had annual average EBITDA growth of 12.70% over the past ten years. GuruFocus rated Moody's Corporation the business predictability rank of 4.5-star.

CEO Recent Trades:

President and CEO Raymond W Mcdaniel sold 44,146 shares of MCO stock on 03/04/2019 at the average price of $175.2. The price of the stock has decreased by 2.36% since.

For the complete insider trading history of MCO, click here

.

Wednesday, March 6, 2019

Hot Dividend Stocks To Watch Right Now

tags:CEL,PPL,IRET,COP,UMH,TEF,

American Express Co. (NYSE: AXP) reported fourth-quarter and full-year 2016 results after markets closed Thursday. The midstream giant posted earnings per share (EPS) of $0.88 per share on revenues of $8.02 billion. In the same period a year ago Amex posted EPS of $0.89 on revenues of $8.39 billion. Consensus estimates called for EPS of $0.98 and revenues of $8.09 billion.

For the full year Amex posted EPS of $5.65 and revenues of $32.12 billion compared with EPS in 2015 of $5.05 and annual revenues of $32.82 billion. Analysts were looking for EPS of $5.75 and revenues totaling $32 billion.

Since the November elections the company’s stock has jumped about 15% ($10) per share and Amex likely saw more analyst upgrades since the election than any other Dow 30 stock. The Dow Jones Industrial Average added 13.4% in 2016 but Amex was not among the leaders, posting a below average gain of 8.6% for the year. Combined with a dividend yield of around 1.7%, the bear case for the stock is at least as strong as the bull case which is simply continued valuation hikes in the financial sector resulting from the Trump rally.

Hot Dividend Stocks To Watch Right Now: Cellcom Israel Ltd.(CEL)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Lisa Levin]

    Thursday afternoon, the telecommunication services shares surged 0.58 percent. Meanwhile, top gainers in the sector included Intelsat S.A. (NYSE: I), up 5 percent, and Cellcom Israel Ltd. (NYSE: CEL) up 2.5 percent.

  • [By Ethan Ryder]

    Millicom (OTCMKTS: MIICF) and Cellcom Israel (NYSE:CEL) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the better business? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their risk, valuation, dividends, institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, earnings and profitability.

  • [By Lisa Levin]

    Thursday afternoon, the health care shares rose 1.79 percent. Meanwhile, top gainers in the sector included Partner Communications Company Ltd. (NASDAQ: PTNR), up 8 percent, and Cellcom Israel Ltd. (NYSE: CEL) up 7 percent.

Hot Dividend Stocks To Watch Right Now: PPL Corporation(PPL)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Joseph Griffin]

    ValuEngine cut shares of Pembina Pipeline (NYSE:PBA) (TSE:PPL) from a hold rating to a sell rating in a research note released on Monday.

    Separately, Zacks Investment Research lowered Pembina Pipeline from a strong-buy rating to a hold rating in a research note on Wednesday, May 2nd. Two research analysts have rated the stock with a sell rating, two have given a hold rating and one has issued a buy rating to the company’s stock. The company presently has a consensus rating of Hold and an average target price of $37.00.

  • [By Paul Ausick]

    PPL Corp. (NYSE: PPL) posted a 52-week low of $30.74 after closing Tuesday at $30.76. The 52-week high is $40.20. Volume was about 3.2 million, about 25% below the daily average of around 4.5 million shares. The electric utility company had no specific news.

  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    PPL Co. (NYSE:PPL) was the recipient of a significant decrease in short interest during the month of April. As of April 30th, there was short interest totalling 17,988,914 shares, a decrease of 18.2% from the April 13th total of 22,001,974 shares. Based on an average daily volume of 5,372,103 shares, the short-interest ratio is presently 3.3 days. Approximately 2.6% of the company’s shares are short sold.

  • [By Joseph Griffin]

    Goelzer Investment Management Inc. boosted its holdings in shares of PPL Co. (NYSE:PPL) by 3.6% in the first quarter, according to the company in its most recent 13F filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The firm owned 120,687 shares of the utilities provider’s stock after acquiring an additional 4,140 shares during the period. Goelzer Investment Management Inc.’s holdings in PPL were worth $3,414,000 at the end of the most recent reporting period.

  • [By ]

    2) Review your goals. Are you retired and managing your portfolio for income and realize you're loaded up with low- to no-yield growth stocks? It's time to make some adjustments. As the second half of the year encounters choppier waters, many equity strategists have recommended reducing risk by pivoting toward more defensive stocks in sectors such as pharmaceuticals, utilities, and consumer staples. Some great names that are currently trading at attractive levels include health care giant Johnson & Johnson (NYSE: JNJ), power producer PPL Corp (NYSE: PPL) and food giant General Mills (NYSE: GIS). Weighted equally, all three yield an average of 4.3% and trade with a forward PE of just 14.17.

  • [By Max Byerly]

    PPL (NYSE:PPL) had its target price dropped by equities researchers at Morgan Stanley from $29.00 to $28.00 in a research report issued to clients and investors on Wednesday. The firm presently has an “equal weight” rating on the utilities provider’s stock. Morgan Stanley’s target price would indicate a potential upside of 7.16% from the stock’s previous close.

Hot Dividend Stocks To Watch Right Now: Investors Real Estate Trust(IRET)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Motley Fool Transcribing]

    Investors Real Estate Trust (NYSE:IRET) Q1 2019 Earnings Conference CallSep. 11, 2018 10:00 a.m. ET

    Contents: Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants Prepared Remarks:

    Operator 

  • [By Joseph Griffin]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on Investors Real Estate Trust Reit (IRET)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

  • [By Motley Fool Staff]

    Investors Real Estate Trust (NYSE:IRET) Q4 2018 Earnings Conference CallJun. 28, 2018 10:00 a.m. ET

    Contents: Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants Prepared Remarks:

    Operator

  • [By Shane Hupp]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on INVESTORS REAL ESTATE TRUST REIT Common Stock (IRET)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

  • [By Joseph Griffin]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on INVESTORS REAL ESTATE TRUST REIT Common Stock (IRET)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

Hot Dividend Stocks To Watch Right Now: ConocoPhillips(COP)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Todd Shriber, ETF Professor]

    CFRA has Buy or Strong Buy ratings on 31 energy stocks, including XLE top 10 holdings such as Chevron and ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP).

    What's Next

    “Bell added that President Trump's decision to exit the Iran deal will lead to sanctions on Iran, which is OPEC's third largest supplier of oil, averaging 3.8 million barrels per day (mmb/d),” said Rosenbluth. “CFRA expects Iran's output to be realistically reduced by about 300,000 b/d. CFRA's equity analytical team thinks investing opportunities are found in not only upstream E&P companies, but also downstream refiners as the spread between WTI and Brent prices widen.”

  • [By Chris Lange]

    The number of ConocoPhillips (NYSE: COP) shares short rose slightly to 21.33 million from the previous level of 21.01 million. Shares were trading at $64.79, within a 52-week range of $42.27 to $71.71.

  • [By Matthew DiLallo]

    However, the region has been growing so fast that oil producers are on pace to exceed its pipeline capacity in a matter of months. While several new lines are under development, drillers have already started slowing down. ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) and Noble Energy (NYSE:NBL) were among several producers that recently announced plans to reallocate some of their drilling activities to other regions. In ConocoPhillips' case, it plans to drill more wells in the Eagle Ford shale, while Noble Energy will likely allocate more capital to Eagle Ford and the DJ Basin.

  • [By Reuben Gregg Brewer]

    In 2012, ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) enacted a major corporate overhaul. It spun off its downstream assets (which is what refining and chemicals businesses are called in industry lingo) so it could focus on its upstream (or drilling) business. This shift meant oil and natural gas prices were the main factor driving the company's top and bottom lines. When oil prices plummeted in mid-2014, going from over $100 a barrel to the $30 range, it wasn't long before ConocoPhillips was forced to cut its dividend.

  • [By Matthew DiLallo]

    One of the most notable has been ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP), which first started buying back its stock in late 2016. The oil giant announced a $3 billion buyback in November of that year, which it planned to finance with asset sales. ConocoPhillips would go on to sell more than double the amount of assets it initially expected, which enabled the company to complete that authorization by the end of 2017. Meanwhile, it's working to buy back another $3 billion in stock this year as part of a $15 billion program through 2020 that could also see the company retire 20% of its outstanding stock depending on its purchase prices. However, with shares of ConocoPhillips up 64% since announcing the plan -- versus an 8% decline for Devon Energy -- it's not going to get as much bang for its buyback buck going forward.

  • [By Matthew DiLallo]

    While higher oil prices would be bad for oil consumers, it would benefit oil producers, especially those that can capture Brent-based prices, which are currently $10 a barrel more than the U.S. oil benchmark West Texas Intermediate (WTI). Multinational oil companies like ConocoPhillips (NYSE:COP) and Chevron (NYSE:CVX) would be among those that benefit the most. In ConocoPhillips' case, every $1-per-barrel change in the price of Brent would boost its cash flow by $105 million to $125 million during the course of a year, whereas that same increase would only improve its WTI-based cash flows by $45 million to $55 million. Meanwhile, Chevron produces an average of 575,000 BPD of oil and other liquids in the U.S. that fetch WTI-based prices while getting nearly 1.2 million BPD from places that capture Brent pricing. Because of their higher weighting toward Brent, Chevron and ConocoPhillips would earn more money per barrel if global oil prices rise in the wake of supply problems in Venezuela and Iran.

Hot Dividend Stocks To Watch Right Now: UMH Properties Inc.(UMH)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Logan Wallace]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on UMH PROPERTIES/SH SH (UMH)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

  • [By Lisa Levin]

    Wednesday afternoon, the real estate shares surged 0.56 percent. Meanwhile, top gainers in the sector included Armada Hoffler Properties, Inc. (NYSE: AHH), up 3 percent, and UMH Properties, Inc. (NYSE: UMH) up 3 percent.

  • [By Shane Hupp]

    TRADEMARK VIOLATION NOTICE: “Loeb Partners Corp Has $1.44 Million Holdings in UMH PROPERTIES/SH SH (UMH)” was first reported by Ticker Report and is the property of of Ticker Report. If you are viewing this article on another domain, it was stolen and reposted in violation of U.S. and international trademark and copyright laws. The correct version of this article can be viewed at https://www.tickerreport.com/banking-finance/4159809/loeb-partners-corp-has-1-44-million-holdings-in-umh-properties-sh-sh-umh.html.

  • [By Joseph Griffin]

    WINTON GROUP Ltd bought a new stake in UMH PROPERTIES/SH SH (NYSE:UMH) during the first quarter, according to the company in its most recent filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC). The fund bought 86,705 shares of the real estate investment trust’s stock, valued at approximately $1,163,000. WINTON GROUP Ltd owned about 0.24% of UMH PROPERTIES/SH SH as of its most recent SEC filing.

  • [By Max Byerly]

    Get a free copy of the Zacks research report on UMH PROPERTIES/SH SH (UMH)

    For more information about research offerings from Zacks Investment Research, visit Zacks.com

Hot Dividend Stocks To Watch Right Now: Telefonica SA(TEF)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Joseph Griffin]

    Telefonica (NYSE: TEF) and Koninklijke KPN (OTCMKTS:KKPNY) are both large-cap utilities companies, but which is the better investment? We will contrast the two businesses based on the strength of their dividends, profitability, institutional ownership, earnings, valuation, risk and analyst recommendations.

  • [By Logan Wallace]

    Here are some of the media stories that may have impacted Accern Sentiment’s rankings:

    Get Stellar Biotechnologies alerts: 200 days simple moving average (SMA200) to Watch Flotek Industries, Inc. (NYSE:FTK), Stellar Biotechnologies, Inc … (stocksnewspoint.com) Morning Stocks You Can’t Afford to Pass Up:: Freeport-McMoRan Inc. (NYSE:FCX), Stellar Biotechnologies, Inc … (journalfinance.net) Should Investors Adjust Their Holdings in Stellar Biotechnologies, Inc. (NasdaqCM:SBOT)? Target Weight Stands at … (bedfordnewsjournal.com) Bright Stocks in Review: Bank of America Corporation (NYSE:BAC), Stellar Biotechnologies, Inc. (NASDAQ:SBOT … (journalfinance.net) Notable News Review: Telefonica, SA, (NYSE: TEF), Stellar Biotechnologies, Inc., (NASDAQ: SBOT) (globalexportlines.com)

    Separately, ValuEngine upgraded shares of Stellar Biotechnologies from a “buy” rating to a “strong-buy” rating in a research report on Tuesday, May 8th.

  • [By Max Byerly]

    BME:TEF traded up €0.15 ($0.19) during midday trading on Friday, reaching €8.20 ($10.12). 33,480,000 shares of the stock traded hands, compared to its average volume of 23,390,000. Telef?nica has a 12 month low of €7.45 ($9.20) and a 12 month high of €10.63 ($13.12).

    ILLEGAL ACTIVITY NOTICE: “Telef?nica (TEF) Receives €9.69 Consensus PT from Brokerages” was originally reported by Ticker Report and is the property of of Ticker Report. If you are viewing this news story on another site, it was illegally copied and republished in violation of international copyright law. The legal version of this news story can be viewed at https://www.tickerreport.com/banking-finance/3380340/telef%ef%bf%bdnica-tef-receives-9-69-consensus-pt-from-brokerages.html.

    About Telef?nica

Tuesday, March 5, 2019

4 Power Moves To Save More For Retirement

&l;p&g;Sometimes saving enough for retirement isn&s;t just a math problem. It&s;s a motivation issue.

While the math is pretty durable -- the more you save, the better off you&s;ll be -- that&s;s not enough for most savers. They&s;ll need that extra nudge.

What motivates savers the most? Simple lessons in how much you can increase your nest egg by doing little or nothing is a start. Here are four big motivators most retirement savers need to know:

&l;img class=&q;dam-image getty size-large wp-image-1127345267&q; src=&q;https://specials-images.forbesimg.com/dam/imageserve/1127345267/960x0.jpg?fit=scale&q; data-height=&q;640&q; data-width=&q;960&q;&g; Getty

&l;strong&g;-- Take the Employer Match Because It&s;s Free Money. &l;/strong&g;Many 401(k) and 403(b) plans offer a matching contribution, but you have to have skin in the game to get the free cash.

&q;Many employers,&q; notes &l;a href=&q;http://planpilot.com/five-ways-to-increase-retirement-plan-participation-among-millennials/&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;Planpilot.com&l;/a&g;, &q;will match employee contributions dollar-for-dollar up to a certain percent, doubling the total amount the employee contributes to retirement while generating a deductible business expense. As an alternative, or to encourage an even higher savings rate, employers may opt to stagger the match&a;mdash;for example, offering a 100% match up to three percent and then a 50% match from three to ten percent.&q;

&l;strong&g;-- Know the Silent Superpower of Compound Interest. &l;/strong&g;This is what happens when you leave money in and it grows all by itself over time. It works for everyone and it&s;s simple math.

&q;Someone who puts aside $1,000 per month from age 25 to 35 (at 7% annual return rate) will have more than $1.4 million by age 65, whereas someone who sets aside the same amount from age 45 to 55 will end up with just a hair under $375,000 at age 65,&q; according to Planpilot.com.

&l;strong&g;-- Know that your retirement savings are portable.&l;/strong&g; You&s;ll probably work several jobs in your lifetime. Even if you start investing in a 401(k), all the money is yours. You can roll it over into a new employer&s;s plan, leave it with your old employer or transfer it into an IRA. Just don&s;t pull it out. Leave it in your plan.

&l;strong&g;-- Know the Power of Tax Advantages. &l;/strong&g;If you contribute to a 401(k)-type plan, you&s;ll pay no taxes going in, but your withdrawals are taxed.

Roth IRAs and 401(k)s are the opposite: There are no taxes on withdrawals, but there are &l;a href=&q;http://money.com/money/4258994/traditional-401k-roth-401k-retirement/&q; target=&q;_blank&q;&g;restrictions. &l;/a&g;Health Savings Account contributions are not taxed; withdrawals are not taxed either, as long as you use the proceeds for health-related expenses.

The bottom line is that money knowledge is power. Use it wisely and you can build a great nest egg.&l;/p&g;

Monday, March 4, 2019

Best Tech Stocks To Own Right Now

tags:STV,TGH,EXTR,ALLT,GIGM,BRCM,

Shares of Baidu (NASDAQ:BIDU) tumbled 10% on May 18, after the company announced the upcoming departure of COO Qi Lu in July. Prior to joining Baidu in early 2017, Lu served as Microsoft's executive VP of its Applications and Services Group. As one of the industry's leading AI experts, Lu played a key role in Baidu's transition from an online search company to a cloud and AI services provider.

When Lu initially joined Baidu, CEO Robin Li stated: "With Dr. Lu on board, we are confident that our strategy will be executed smoothly and Baidu will become a world-class technology company and global leader in AI." Lu stated that he was "excited to help realize Baidu's visionary AI strategy."

Image source: Getty Images.

Lu will remain vice chairman of Baidu's board but stated that he was "no longer able to work in China on a full-time basis" for "personal and family reasons." His departure will likely hurt Baidu, which is battling Tencent (NASDAQOTH:TCEHY) and Alibaba (NYSE:BABA) in the cloud and AI markets.

Best Tech Stocks To Own Right Now: China Digital TV Holding Co., Ltd.(STV)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    Sativacoin (CURRENCY:STV) traded 2.1% higher against the US dollar during the 1-day period ending at 22:00 PM E.T. on May 9th. Over the last week, Sativacoin has traded up 0.1% against the US dollar. One Sativacoin coin can now be purchased for $0.0318 or 0.00000341 BTC on popular exchanges including Cryptopia and YoBit. Sativacoin has a market capitalization of $225,415.00 and $19.00 worth of Sativacoin was traded on exchanges in the last 24 hours.

Best Tech Stocks To Own Right Now: Textainer Group Holdings Limited(TGH)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Matthew DiLallo]

    Last year was one that investors in Textainer Group Holdings (NYSE:TGH) will likely remember fondly as the container leasing company's stock rocketed an eye-popping 188%. This year, however, has been a different story as shares are down nearly 30% since the beginning of the year, and more than 40% off their high. That sell-off might have investors wondering if now's a good time to buy.

  • [By Reuben Gregg Brewer]

    Although Textainer Group Holdings Limited (NYSE:TGH) and Teekay Corporation (NYSE:TK) are both focused on the shipping industry, they go about it in vastly different ways. Both companies were hit hard by industry downturns, but Textainer started to see a notable improvement in its container business in 2017. Teekay's collection of ship-owning businesses in the energy sector, on the other hand, continued to struggle overall -- but signs seem to point to an upturn this year. Which one is the better buy today?

  • [By Stephan Byrd]

    Textainer Group (NYSE: TGH) is one of 17 public companies in the “Equipment rental & leasing, not elsewhere classified” industry, but how does it compare to its competitors? We will compare Textainer Group to related businesses based on the strength of its dividends, analyst recommendations, earnings, institutional ownership, profitability, risk and valuation.

Best Tech Stocks To Own Right Now: Extreme Networks Inc.(EXTR)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Anders Bylund]

    Shares of Extreme Networks (NASDAQ:EXTR) fell 19.5% in May 2018, according to data from S&P Global Market Intelligence. The maker of data center networking equipment delivered a weak third-quarter report and modest guidance on May 8. The stock crashed hard and hasn't recovered yet.

  • [By Lisa Levin]

    Some of the stocks that may grab investor focus today are:

    Wall Street expects Booking Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ: BKNG) to post quarterly earnings at $10.67 per share on revenue of $2.87 billion after the closing bell. Booking Holdings shares gained 0.99 percent to $2,183.00 in after-hours trading. Tripadvisor Inc (NASDAQ: TRIP) reported stronger-than-expected results for its first quarter on Tuesday. Tripadvisor shares climbed 20.55 percent to $46.75 in the after-hours trading session. Analysts are expecting Anheuser-Busch InBev SA/NV (NYSE: BUD) to have earned $0.89 per share on revenue of $13.06 billion in the latest quarter. Anheuser-Busch will release earnings before the markets open. Anheuser-Busch shares gained 0.77 percent to $99.00 in after-hours trading. Extreme Networks, Inc (NASDAQ: EXTR) reported downbeat earnings for its third quarter and issued weak Q4 guidance. Extreme Networks shares fell 28.51 percent to $8.40 in the after-hours trading session. Before the opening bell, Ameren Corporation (NYSE: AEE) is projected to report quarterly earnings at $0.57 per share on revenue of $1.55 billion. Ameren shares dropped 2.78 percent to close at $56.91 on Tuesday.

    Find out what's going on in today's market and bring any questions you have to Benzinga's PreMarket Prep.

  • [By Anders Bylund]

    Shares of network equipment maker Extreme Networks (NASDAQ:EXTR) are having a rough Wednesday. The stock opened 26.8% lower today, following last night's release of disappointing third-quarter results.

  • [By Joseph Griffin]

    Shares of Extreme Networks, Inc (NASDAQ:EXTR) have received an average recommendation of “Buy” from the eight ratings firms that are covering the stock, MarketBeat reports. One research analyst has rated the stock with a sell recommendation, one has assigned a hold recommendation and six have issued a buy recommendation on the company. The average 12 month price objective among brokerages that have issued ratings on the stock in the last year is $15.50.

  • [By Paul Ausick]

    Extreme Networks Inc. (NASDAQ: EXTR) traded down about 2.6% Monday and posted a new 52-week low of $8.13 after closing Friday at $8.35. The stock’s 52-week high is $15.55. Volume totaled around 2.9 million, nearly 60% higher than the daily average of around 1.9 million. The company had no specific news.

Best Tech Stocks To Own Right Now: Allot Communications Ltd.(ALLT)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Max Byerly]

    Allot Communications (NASDAQ:ALLT) and NEC (OTCMKTS:NIPNF) are both computer and technology companies, but which is the superior stock? We will compare the two businesses based on the strength of their institutional ownership, analyst recommendations, dividends, profitability, earnings, valuation and risk.

  • [By Shane Hupp]

    Allot Communications (NASDAQ: ALLT) and Extreme Networks (NASDAQ:EXTR) are both small-cap computer and technology companies, but which is the superior business? We will compare the two companies based on the strength of their earnings, dividends, risk, institutional ownership, valuation, profitability and analyst recommendations.

  • [By Ethan Ryder]

    Shares of Allot Communications Ltd (NASDAQ:ALLT) have been given an average rating of “Buy” by the seven ratings firms that are covering the company, Marketbeat.com reports. One investment analyst has rated the stock with a sell rating, one has assigned a hold rating and four have given a buy rating to the company. The average 1-year price objective among brokerages that have covered the stock in the last year is $6.68.

  • [By Max Byerly]

    Allot Communications (NASDAQ:ALLT) will be posting its quarterly earnings results before the market opens on Tuesday, May 8th. Analysts expect Allot Communications to post earnings of ($0.10) per share for the quarter.

Best Tech Stocks To Own Right Now: GigaMedia Limited(GIGM)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Logan Wallace]

    Deutsche Bank AG grew its position in GigaMedia Limited (NASDAQ:GIGM) by 69.3% during the fourth quarter, Holdings Channel reports. The fund owned 46,885 shares of the technology company’s stock after acquiring an additional 19,185 shares during the quarter. Deutsche Bank AG’s holdings in GigaMedia were worth $142,000 at the end of the most recent reporting period.

Best Tech Stocks To Own Right Now: Broadcom Corporation(BRCM)

Advisors' Opinion:
  • [By Max Byerly]

    Headlines about Broadcom (NASDAQ:BRCM) have trended somewhat positive this week, according to Accern Sentiment. The research firm scores the sentiment of media coverage by reviewing more than 20 million news and blog sources. Accern ranks coverage of companies on a scale of negative one to positive one, with scores closest to one being the most favorable. Broadcom earned a news impact score of 0.16 on Accern’s scale. Accern also gave media headlines about the semiconductor manufacturer an impact score of 43.7335359332371 out of 100, indicating that recent media coverage is somewhat unlikely to have an impact on the company’s share price in the near future.

  • [By Paul Ausick]

    Broadcom Inc. (NASDAQ: BRCM) traded down about 1.4% Friday and posted a new 52-week low of $222.00 after closing Thursday at $225.25. The stock’s 52-week high is $285.68. Volume totaled around 3.9 million, just under the daily average of about 4.1 million. The company had no specific news.

Saturday, March 2, 2019

Amerisafe (AMSF) Q4 2018 Earnings Conference Call Transcript

Logo of jester cap with thought bubble with words 'Fool Transcripts' below it

Image source: The Motley Fool.

Amerisafe (NASDAQ:AMSF) Q4 2018 Earnings Conference CallFeb. 28, 2019 10:30 a.m. ET

Contents: Prepared Remarks Questions and Answers Call Participants Prepared Remarks:

Operator

Good day, ladies and gentlemen, and welcome to the Amerisafe 2018 fourth-quarter and full-year conference call. [Operator instructions] And as a reminder, this conference call is being recorded. I would now like to introduce your host for today's conference, Ms. Kathryn Shirley, general counsel.

Ms. Shirley, you may begin.

Kathryn Shirley -- General Counsel

Good morning. Welcome to the Amerisafe 2018 fourth-quarter and year-end investor call. If you have not received the earnings release, it is available on our website at www.amerisafe.com. This call is being recorded.

A replay of today's call will be available. Details on how to access the replay are in the earnings release. During this call, we will be making forward-looking statements. These statements are based on current expectations and assumptions that are subject to various risks and uncertainties.

Actual results may differ materially from the results expressed or implied in these statements if the underlying assumptions prove to be incorrect or as a result of risks, uncertainties and other factors, including factors discussed in today's earnings release, in the comments made during this call and in the Risk Factors section of our Form 10-K, Form 10-Qs and other reports and filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. We do not undertake any duty to update any forward-looking statement. I will now turn the call over to Janelle Frost, Amerisafe's president and CEO.

Janelle Frost -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you, Kathryn, good morning, everyone. Another year has come to a close in the soft workers' compensation cycle. In 2018, for the industry, approved loss costs continue to decline. Most customers saw overall rate decreases at renewal.

Multiline carriers were drawn to workers' compensation, and industry expectation is that 2018 will be the fourth consecutive year of underwriting profits. For Amerisafe, these factors led to increased focus on retaining possible accounts, adjusting pricing gradually to be competitive while remaining disciplined, further developing our agent relationships, highlighting our valuable Amerisafe services and deploying capital tools such as dividends both regular and special for shareholder returns. The combination of those efforts by our experienced employees resulted in Amerisafe's consistent financial stability and strong returns for our shareholders. We are pleased that the company reported a combined ratio of 82.9% and a return on average equity of 17.2% in the midst of a soft and highly competitive market.

That's a quick overview of the environment for the year, and now I'll be more specific about the fourth quarter. In the fourth quarter, we did see an increase in competition. I believe that it's best reflected in our policy renewal retention rate, which was down slightly from 93.4% in the fourth quarter of 2017 to 92.5% in the fourth quarter of 2018. The slippage in retention primarily came from larger policies, which we classify as greater than $100,000 in premium and in less hazardous classes in the industries in which we operate.

Overall pricing was also down as our ELCM for the quarter was a 163 compared to 165 in the fourth quarter of 2017. Coupled with a decline in new business activity, our premium per policies we wrote in the quarter was down 7.9%. To add perspective, voluntary premium written was down just 1.5% for the full year. Additive to the overall premium total was audit premium and other adjustments.

In the fourth quarter, audit premium and other adjustments increased gross premiums written $2.3 million, up slightly from the fourth quarter of 2017. There was a onetime negative adjustment in the quarter of $2.3 million to account for an extraordinary error in Pennsylvania loss costs. Due to incorrect data submitted to the rating bureau, not by Amerisafe, Pennsylvania disclosed at year end that loss costs were overstated by 10%. The adjustment to premium was made in December as we decided to voluntarily endorse those policies for the corrected rates.

I believe highlighting this onetime adjustment is important to emphasize that audit premium remains strong in the fourth quarter, consistent with previously reported quarters of 2018. In total, gross premiums written for the quarter were down 7.1% and relatively flat with 2017 full year. Now onto losses. Our loss and loss adjustment expense ratio for the quarter was 58.6%, down from 66.7% in the fourth quarter of 2017.

In separating that ratio into current accident year and all prior accident years, I believe Amerisafe's disciplined approach to risk selection, safety and managing claims become even more evident. Our current accident year loss ratio was 71.5% and remained unchanged from the previous 2018 quarters and up 1 percentage point from the full year of 2017. The increase of 1 point reflects the fact that we collected less premium for increasing exposures, that is frequency, and moderate increases in severity over a multiyear trend. As we experienced claims throughout the year, there were no trends that caused us to vary from our assumptions that we made at the beginning of the year.

As for prior accident years, we had $11.5 million or a 12.9 loss ratio percentage points of favorable development as we were able to close and make cost-saving progress on older claims. The major contributors to the favorable case development were accident years 2016, 2015, 2011 and 2009. In this extended period of declining loss costs in the industry, I believe Amerisafe's intensive claims management is an important distinction in our success. Neal will now discuss the financial results.

Neal?

Neal Fuller -- Chief Financial Officer

Thank you, Janelle. For the fourth quarter of 2018, Amerisafe reported net income of $18.8 million or $0.98 per diluted share compared with $649,000 or $0.03 per diluted share in last year's fourth quarter. Last year, you will recall that net income was impacted by tax reform due to a revaluation of our net deferred tax assets at the new lower corporate rate of 21%. This created a noncash charge of $12.6 million last year, which lowered net income by $0.66 per share.

Operating net income, which excludes unrealized and realized gains and losses on our investment portfolio, was $20.7 million for the quarter or $1.07 per share, an increase from $0.69 in the fourth quarter of last year. For the full year 2018, Amerisafe produced net income of $71.6 million or $3.71 per share. Operating net income for the full year 2018 was $74.5 million or $3.86 per share. This level of operating income is our second best year ever, only slightly behind the record operating earnings we achieved in 2016.

Revenues in the quarter were down 0.3% to $94.7 million compared with the fourth quarter of 2017. Net premiums earned increased 1.7% to $88.8 million when compared to last year's fourth quarter. For the full year, net premiums earned were up 1.2%, totaling some $350.3 million. Turning to net investment income, we saw an increase of 10.2% in the fourth quarter to $8.1 million compared with $7.3 million in the fourth quarter of 2017.

The increase was due to higher yields on investments compared with last year. Net investment income for the full year was up 4% to $30.5 million compared with $29.3 million in 2017. The tax equivalent yield on our investment portfolio was 3.15% at year end. The pre-tax yield on the portfolio at year end was 2.81%, up 27 basis points from 2.54% 1 year ago.

There were no impairments on any of the securities held in the portfolio during the quarter or for the full-year 2018, and there were no significant realized gains or losses during the quarter. The investment portfolio is high quality, carrying an average AA rating with current duration of 4.16, and the portfolio is composed of 58% in municipal bonds, 24% in corporate bonds, 11% in U.S. treasuries and agencies and the remainder in cash and other investments. Approximately 56% of our bond portfolio is comprised of held-to-maturity securities, which were in an overall unrealized gain position of $2.9 million at year end.

These gains are not reflected in our year-end book value as these bonds are carried at amortized costs. We have a small investment in equities, about 1.6% of our investment portfolio. During the volatile fourth quarter in the stock market, these securities declined by $2.3 million in value. And with these changes in value now running through the income statement, this impacted net income by about $0.10 per share.

Moving now to operating expenses, our total underwriting and other expenses were $19 million in the quarter compared with $18.1 million in the fourth quarter of 2017. The increase was primarily due to higher premium-based insurance assessments compared to the same quarter last year. By category, the 2018 fourth quarter expenses included $7.2 million of salaries and benefits, $6.6 million of commissions and $5.1 million of underwriting and other costs. Our expense ratio for the quarter was 21.4% compared with 20.7% for the fourth quarter of 2017.

For the full-year 2018, operating expenses increased $2.4 million or 3%, primarily due to an increase in commissions compared to 2017. Our expense ratio for the full year was slightly higher at 23.2% compared with 22.8% in 2017. Our tax rate for the fourth quarter was 17.4% and 18.2% for the full year, much lower than in 2017 due to the benefit of the new lower federal corporate tax rate of 21%. Return on equity for the fourth quarter of 2018 was 17.3% compared to 0.6% for the fourth quarter of 2017, which was impacted by tax reform.

For the full year, ROE was 17.2% compared with 10.5% last year. Operating ROE for the quarter was a very strong 19%. Operating ROE for the full year was 17.9% compared with 13.3% in 2017. And now to capital management.

During the fourth quarter, the company paid its regular quarterly cash dividend of $0.22 per share, as well as an extraordinary dividend of $3.50 per share. This quarter, the board has declared a quarterly cash dividend of $0.25 per share, payable on March 22, 2019 to shareholders of record as of March 8, 2019. This represents a 14% increase in the regular quarterly dividend. And finally, just a couple of other noteworthy items.

Book value per share at December 31, 2018 was $21.26, down slightly compared with last year's $22.10 per share. And we paid out $4.38 per share in dividends to shareholders during the year. Our statutory surplus in the insurance subsidiaries was $384 million at December 31, 2018 compared with $382 million at the end of 2017 after paying a $65 million dividend up to the parent company. And finally, we will be filing our Form 10-K with the SEC today after the market close.

That concludes my remarks, and now we would like to open up the call for the question-and-answer session. Operator? 

Questions and Answers:

Operator

[Operator instructions] Our first question comes from Randy Binner from B. Riley FBR.

Ryan Aceto -- B. Riley FBR, Inc. -- Analyst

This is actually Ryan Aceto on for Randy. I wanted to touch on the voluntary business, down about $6 million year over year in 4Q '18. I don't know if its due to competition or any specific business line you're seeing decreasing.

Janelle Frost -- President and Chief Executive Officer

So the decrease that we saw in the fourth quarter is what we perceived to be increased competition simply because we saw it. We saw some slippage in our renewal retention in terms of policy count, and at least in the first half of 2018, we were seeing record renewal retention. So there was definitely slippage there in the fourth quarter, which we attribute to increased competition. We don't see -- I haven't seen any new entrants in the space.

It's the same, as we've been talking about the last few quarters, multiline carriers that are picking up workers' comp premium due to poor results in other lines. And keep in mind, part of the reason the premium is lower is because loss costs have declined. So we still are getting double-digit rate decreases so the underlying rates they were allowed to charge is lower as well. So our specific industries -- I don't want to give away any competitive information.

But when we think about workers' comp, there's hazard group, hazard classes A to G. And where we've seen slippage or I should say, what we tend to write is more the E to Gs, F to Gs. And where we saw the slippage was in the D and E classes of business without getting into specific industries or states.

Ryan Aceto -- B. Riley FBR, Inc. -- Analyst

I appreciate that color, and then one more on the accident year 2017. Just wondering could you give initial thoughts as -- or continuing to see 2015 and 2016 come through favorably?

Janelle Frost -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes. At the end of calendar year '17, I think we have reported out that we had, I'm looking at Neal, 18 large claims, if that was the right number, at the end of '17 -- for accident year '17. And if you recall, at the end of first -- in the third quarter, we said we had 18 for accident year 2018, and we ended the year with 18 in accident year 2018. So that kind of gives you a comparison from '18 to '17 in terms of the severity of the larger claims.

But for '17 itself, I think at the end of the year, as you recall, we increased our loss pick for that accident year because we saw an uptick in severity that concerned us. Enough that we thought, is this an outlier? Is this a trend? And so I feel more comfortable about '17 now than I did at the end of '17.

Operator

Our next question comes from Mark Hughes from SunTrust.

Mark Hughes -- SunTrust Robinson Humphrey -- Analyst

I may have some background music. I apologize for that. The $2.3 million premium audit, is that net of $2.3 million? So otherwise, it would've been $4.6 million for auto premium?

Janelle Frost -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Right. So the $2.3 million from the Pennsylvania loss cost error came out of the auto premium. So you're right. You would have to gross that back up to get to what have been a normalized reporting number that we normally would report on.

And of course, that includes endorsements, cancellations, those sort of things. We're still seeing strong audit premium, just stand-alone audit premium even in the fourth quarter. But obviously, we wanted to highlight the adjustment because it was a onetime adjustment, and it was for rates dating back to April 1st. So it was impactful to us.

Mark Hughes -- SunTrust Robinson Humphrey -- Analyst

In light of your commentary about '18, you were making sure that any uptick in severity or frequency, you had that covered in the loss pick for '18. So when we think about '19, prices still coming down a bit. It came down a bit, but loss costs -- underlying loss costs are down. Any early thoughts on 2019? Maybe another point higher in 2019 or...

Janelle Frost -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Mark, I agree with your comment. We saw loss costs continue to decline in '18. I don't see anything stopping that from happening in '19. So as we look forward, those are very similar thoughts to what we thought coming into '18 as far as I don't see any improvement coming from the loss cost side of things the rates were able to charge.

Mark Hughes -- SunTrust Robinson Humphrey -- Analyst

Is that, let's say, more steady? Or maybe being a little conservative and going up is the better approach?

Janelle Frost -- President and Chief Executive Officer

I would say this, I think my position looking -- at the end of '17 looking into '18 is very similar at the end of '18 looking into '19.

Mark Hughes -- SunTrust Robinson Humphrey -- Analyst

Very good. The new business activity, I think you said it was down. Is that just part and parcel of the stepped-up competition? Or were there any new initiatives that somebody else did? Or you were in a low in that new business? Any additional insight there?

Janelle Frost -- President and Chief Executive Officer

No. It's the same battle. We can appreciate that agents were in the same position as Amerisafe is, and that there's just not a lot of books of business moving around out there. People are happy with their renewals, and they get a price.

They may switch based on the price. But new business -- again, we're talking about new business to us, which is typically someone else's renewal business. It's just really hard to come by. So we've really taken a concerted effort of just developing relationships with our agents, trying to make sure that they're successful, and their success is based on where we've been successful, where we've been able to put quotes our there that as a price that the customer and both the agent agree with, and more importantly, that we can sail the value proposition of Amerisafe services.

Because as I said in my prepared remarks, that's where the key is for us in terms of the way we handle our claims, how important safety is to our policyholders and our agents and getting that message out there and selling that as part of the quote. But that's the challenge we face with new business. Our renewal customer has experienced those things. So it's selling that to new customers.

Mark Hughes -- SunTrust Robinson Humphrey -- Analyst

Right. On the reserve. I think you've been pretty clear that it's in case development that has really driven the gain. Presumably, there's a lot of IBNR out there as well if the -- you continue to see improvement on the case.

When does the IBNR kind of kick in, in terms of your ability to get comfortable? But that may be redundant as well.

Janelle Frost -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes. Go ahead, Neal.

Neal Fuller -- Chief Financial Officer

Yes. Mark, this is Neal Fuller. I think you know our sort of pattern that we do with reserves and looking, we'll let you make your own judgment about our reserve. So we just recently filed our statutory statements with the NAIC, so you can look at the triangles and see.

But as those accident years age, typically, Amerisafe get more and more comfortable. Each quarter or each year, they get a little bit older, and so we're more likely to take down IBNR as those accident years age. Similar to our pattern in the past.

Mark Hughes -- SunTrust Robinson Humphrey -- Analyst

Right, and I'm right in thinking that most of what you've been booking in terms of gains the last year led to that and its largely case development. Is that right?

Neal Fuller -- Chief Financial Officer

I think particularly in 2018, we commented, I think, on several of our quarterly calls that primarily what was driving the reduction in the estimate for reserve was case reserve development, driven really significantly by favorable case reserve development.

Mark Hughes -- SunTrust Robinson Humphrey -- Analyst

And I'll ask one more. The ceded premium ratio, that's fractionally higher this quarter. Anything to that?

Neal Fuller -- Chief Financial Officer

No. I think if you look at the full year, that's a good guide for future. There's no significant changes in our reinsurance program.

Operator

[Operator instructions] Our next question comes from Christopher Campbell from KBW.

Christopher Campbell -- KBW -- Analyst

Great. So I just kind of have some high level -- I just have a few high-level questions. I guess, just as rates are -- as you're getting the rate declines via the state bureaus, I guess what defenses do you guys have against these rate declines? And what levers are you pulling behind the scenes so that it's not as big of an impact on your book?

Janelle Frost -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Yes. I'll say this about the experience of our underwriting department and the way we go about our risk selection. I think our underwriting, coupled with the way we do our safety, surveys and go out and see these accounts before we've actually put the price on, I think we really do a really quality job at risk selection. And given our history and our consistent history, more importantly, I think we know going in when we're putting those quotes out what price we need for these accounts.

And it's individually underwritten. So it's not, "Oh well, we know loss costs in the state are down 10%. So let me figure out how that's going to factor into this policy." It's more of what -- individually underwriting this account, what is the price that we need to get for this account. And of course, we all report that in the aggregate out to the public in our ELCM.

But the defense is making sure that we're just not following the leader. The defense is not letting our competition set our price. That's what kept the long-term profitability of Amerisafe. It's in that risk selection criteria that we have, and the fact that we're just not willing to compromise that.

We want to work with our customers. We want to work with our agents. We want to do the right thing. But at the end of the day, they're all better off if we're financially stable as well.

And just chasing that dollar all the way down is not the right answer, and our long-term history has proven that.

Christopher Campbell -- KBW -- Analyst

OK. Great. And then just digging a little bit more just on your pricing, new business, ELCMs. All of those things.

I guess just like in terms of like the new business, I guess you're "not winning." I guess, why are you losing that? Is it price? Or is there other features that these -- the multiline carriers, are they broadening their product offerings to kind of offer more of what Amerisafe does? I guess just tell us that whole competitive milieu development.

Janelle Frost -- President and Chief Executive Officer

I would definitely think or I believe the multiline carriers probably had the most impact there simply because they can put that together as a package, and that's attractive to the end customer. If they haven't had an experience with the mono-line, that they can draw that in because they're packing the policy as a whole, and so they're not really looking at just what is the workers' comp pricing. So I'm assuming part of that is probably pricing, but that's a little hard for me to compare because it's really not an apples to apples. We're now competing against the multiline because they're going to give and take on various lines to get the overall price that they want.

But yes, I believe it's more so the multiline carrier.

Operator

I'm not showing any further questions at this time. I would now like to turn the call back over to Ms. Janelle Frost, CEO, for any further remarks.

Janelle Frost -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Thank you. Earlier in the call, I highlighted claims management as a distinction for Amerisafe, and so I'd like to conclude by focusing on distinctions. First, as previously mentioned, we intensely manage claims to achieve maximum medical improvement and return to work for injured workers while managing costs for employers and, ultimately, all stakeholders; secondly, we are experienced, disciplined underwriters with a high-hazard small to midsized employer focus; third, we emphasize safety to our policyholders, making safety an integral part of our risk selection process; fourth, we're frugal with operating expenses; and lastly, service is embedded in our culture, whether it's service to a policyholder, an agent, a claimant, a fellow employee or the communities in which we live and operate. These are just a few of the distinctions that have made and will continue to make Amerisafe a success.

We are built on a foundation that withstands the ups and downs of the instrument cycle over the long term. And finally, yesterday, Amerisafe announced the retirement of one of our long-serving board members, Danny Phillips, who will leave the board at the end of his term in June. Danny has served our company and our shareholders very well over 11 years. On behalf of the board and the Amerisafe employees, we thank him for his service, and wish him continued success.

Thank you for joining us today.

Operator

[Operator signoff]

Duration: 29 minutes

Call Participants:

Kathryn Shirley -- General Counsel

Janelle Frost -- President and Chief Executive Officer

Neal Fuller -- Chief Financial Officer

Ryan Aceto -- B. Riley FBR, Inc. -- Analyst

Mark Hughes -- SunTrust Robinson Humphrey -- Analyst

Christopher Campbell -- KBW -- Analyst

More AMSF analysis

This article is a transcript of this conference call produced for The Motley Fool. While we strive for our Foolish Best, there may be errors, omissions, or inaccuracies in this transcript. As with all our articles, The Motley Fool does not assume any responsibility for your use of this content, and we strongly encourage you to do your own research, including listening to the call yourself and reading the company's SEC filings. Please see our Terms and Conditions for additional details, including our Obligatory Capitalized Disclaimers of Liability.

10 stocks we like better than AmerisafeWhen investing geniuses David and Tom Gardner have a stock tip, it can pay to listen. After all, the newsletter they have run for over a decade, Motley Fool Stock Advisor, has quadrupled the market.*

David and Tom just revealed what they believe are the ten best stocks for investors to buy right now... and Amerisafe wasn't one of them! That's right -- they think these 10 stocks are even better buys.

See the 10 stocks

*Stock Advisor returns as of February 1, 2019